Richard Dawkins says there can be an intelligent designer but that person cannot be God. LOL:
Contradictory things evolutionists say:
One of these guys actually says that humans are fish. LOL:
sci•ence (sīˈəns)
- n.an observation that has been confirmed repeatedly and is accepted as true (although its truth is never final)
Under this definition of science, the theory of evolution fails the definition of science. There are zero recorded instances of one animal turning into another kind of animal. No bird has become anything other than a bird. To believe that one kind of animal can become another kind of animal, you would have to exercise faith.
This idea that millions of years have turned dinosaurs into other creatures is not only false, it has been completely disproven by the discovery of soft dinosaur tissue. In fact, you can see a video of soft tissue from the horn of a triceratops being dissected here.
Related posts:
Video: Human and dinosaur footprints in rock disproves evolution 
Video: David Hecht, Jewish man seeks relationship with his God 
Video: Is Christmas pagan? Video: Keep the Holy Spirit alive after deliverance Video: Are you sick and tired of the cycle of temptation and sin? Video: The kingdom of God is within you Video: What should a biblical church look like? Video: Head of Human Genome Project rejects atheism Video: Why do evolutionists have to ask, are you comfortable with evolution? Video: See the soft tissue in a triceratops horn Video: Sugar makes you fatter than eating fats Video: Evolution vs God Video: Kent Hovind explains creation science Video: How the theory of evolution influenced Jeffrey Dahmer and how he turned to Christ Evolution is a theory
Nowhere in the Dawkins video does he contradict anything, he is simply
implying the intelligent designer of life on Earth could of, theoretically came from more intelligent life such as aliens but they then would of course had to of evolved.
Cherry picking parts of a lecture video for your own means without the full context isn’t cool 🙁
It’s what he said: there are intelligent designers. As to why that intelligent designer cannot be God, he does not explain. It demonstrates prejudice.
Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and atheist so he wouldn’t bother to mention God in his response, as he uses scientific reasoning for the answers in that video.
Far from prejudice he’s quite happy for people to have faith as long as it doesn’t get in the way of educating people about science. 🙂
I think Dawkins, in this clip, is actually anti-God. So, I can’t really agree with you that he is happy for people to have faith. As for evolution, I’m not sure if you’re aware but they’ve found soft dinosaur tissue not that long ago. To my view, this totally disproves evolution.